[Lemon-user] Using Lemon for online algorithms
Balazs Dezso
deba.mf at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 07:10:12 CEST 2010
Hi,
> ListDigraph::NodeMap<string> onlinename(i);
>
> I get the following errors:
>
> /media/disk/wq2010/research/algmatching5.cpp|88|error: no matching
> function for call to
> ‘lemon::DigraphExtender<lemon::ListDigraphBase>::NodeMap<std::basic_string<
> char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >
>
> >::NodeMap(lemon::FilterArcs<lemon::ListDigraph,
>
> lemon::DigraphExtender<lemon::ListDigraphBase>::ArcMap<bool> >&)’|
>
> /usr/local/include/lemon/bits/graph_extender.h|227|note: candidates
> are: lemon::DigraphExtender<Base>::NodeMap<_Value>::NodeMap(const
> lemon::DigraphExtender<Base>&, const _Value&) [with _Value =
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>
> >, Base = lemon::ListDigraphBase]|
If you want to create a node map for the subgraph, you have to use the
following type:
FilterArcs<ListDigraph>::NodeMap<string> onlinename(i);
The FilterArcs<ListDigraph> is the subgraph type, which is fully conform to
the lemon::concept::Digraph type. You can also iterate over the arcs of this
graph:
for (FilterArcs<ListDigraph>::NodeIt n(i); n != INVALID; ++n) {
cout << onlinename[n] << endl;
}
I hope, it helps to understand the meaning of graph adaptors. And sorry for
the weaknesses of the documentation.
Best regards, Balazs
On Thursday 08 April 2010 04:50:03 CW wrote:
> First of all, thank you so much for the quick response. I appreciate
> it very much. One more question and hopefully this will be it.
>
> >> The basic gist of it is that nodes arrive and lock. When they arrive,
> >> I iterate through G and add the relevant edges to I. When they lock,
> >> I iterate through I and delete the relevant edges from I (and add the
> >> one that matched via the matching algorithm to H, but that's not
> >> important here).
> >
> > I think, it would be easier and safer to use subgraph adaptors. E.g.
> >
> > ListDigraph g;
> > // build g by adding nodes and arcs
> > ListDigraph::ArcMap<bool> filter_h(g, false), filter_i(g, false);
> > FilterArcs h(g, filter_h), i(g, filter_i);
> >
> > This code snippet creates a digraph g and two subgraphs of it: h and i,
> > which contain all the nodes of g and no arcs. You can show/hide arcs of
> > the original graph g in subgraphs h and i by modifying the bool values in
> > the corresponding filter arc maps. Using this approach, you can use the
> > nodes and arcs of g in terms of h and i safely, and you can even use the
> > node/arc maps of g along with the subgraphs h and i. For more
> > information, see:
> > http://lemon.cs.elte.hu/pub/tutorial/sec_graph_adaptors.html#sec_subgraph
> >s
>
> This is a very good idea and it is a lot safer than my implementation
> because I am actually deleting nodes and edges in i (I forgot to
> mention that when I delete arcs I also delete the locking node and
> whatever target it matched to), so this is much better. Thank you so
> much. I am running into one problem though. What is the return type
> of:
>
> FilterArcs<ListDigraph> h(g, filter_h), i(g, filter_i);
>
> I assume it's a ListDigraph, but the problem arises when I do
> something like the following:
>
> ListDigraph::ArcMap<bool> filter_h(g, false), filter_i(g, false);
> FilterArcs<ListDigraph> h(g, filter_h), i(g, filter_i);
>
> ListDigraph::NodeMap<string> onlinename(i);
>
> I get the following errors:
>
> /media/disk/wq2010/research/algmatching5.cpp|88|error: no matching
> function for call to
> ‘lemon::DigraphExtender<lemon::ListDigraphBase>::NodeMap<std::basic_string<
> char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >
>
> >::NodeMap(lemon::FilterArcs<lemon::ListDigraph,
>
> lemon::DigraphExtender<lemon::ListDigraphBase>::ArcMap<bool> >&)’|
>
> /usr/local/include/lemon/bits/graph_extender.h|227|note: candidates
> are: lemon::DigraphExtender<Base>::NodeMap<_Value>::NodeMap(const
> lemon::DigraphExtender<Base>&, const _Value&) [with _Value =
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>
> >, Base = lemon::ListDigraphBase]|
>
> And so on (there's a couple more but you get the point). Is this not
> a ListDigraph, but rather some sort of new type like ListSubDigraph or
> something? I apologize if this was in the documentation, I didn't
> seem to see it. The description for FilterArcs says "Creates a
> subdigraph for the given digraph with the given arc filter map.", but
> I wasn't sure if this meant that subdigraph was its own type or not,
> and I didn't seem to see any subgraph types listed in the Graph
> Structures data structures page.
>
> >> Which seems to have worked fine so far. The problem is this. No
> >> matter what test input I generate, the program seems to freeze at some
> >> point while adding edges. Everything else performs exactly how it's
> >> supposed to up until the point that it freezes, but in the following
> >> section of code (the line where it's freezing is marked):
> >>
> >> for (ListDigraph::ArcIt a(g); a != INVALID; ++a)
> >> {
> >> if ((g.source(a) == arrNode))
> >> {
> >> cout<< name[g.source(a)]<< " "<< name[g.target(a)]
> >> << " "<< weight[a]<< endl;
> >> cout<< "Inside the loop, next arriving node is "<<
> >> onlinename[arrNode]<< endl;
> >> cout<< "Which should be the same as "<<
> >> name[g.source(a)]<< endl;
> >> ListDigraph::Arc tempArc = i.addArc(arrNode,
> >> g.target(a)); //This line is freezing the program!!!!!!!!!!
> >> onlineweight[tempArc] = weight[a];
> >> cout<< name[i.source(tempArc)]<< " "<<
> >> name[i.target(tempArc)]<< " "<< onlineweight[tempArc]<< endl;
> >> }
> >> }
> >
> > I think, the only reason for which the addArc() function can fail is that
> > the graph structure does not contain the given nodes. Are you sure that
> > the node set of g, h and i are exactly the same throughout these loops?
> > Could you check i.valid(arrNode) and i.valid(g.target(a)) before trying
> > to add the arc?
>
> That was part of the reason for those outputs above and below the
> text, so I could make sure that the arcs were being added as I
> intended because I am actually deleting nodes from i (not from h or g,
> though). i.valid(arrNode) and i.valid(g.target(a)) do return 1, even
> in the case where it's freezing. However, since this is probably the
> wrong approach to take (due to the fact that I'm deleting nodes and
> arcs), once I get the subgraphs working hopefully it won't freeze
> anymore.
>
> > Regards,
> > Peter
>
> Thank you so very much,
> Corey
> _______________________________________________
> Lemon-user mailing list
> Lemon-user at lemon.cs.elte.hu
> http://lemon.cs.elte.hu/mailman/listinfo/lemon-user
>
More information about the Lemon-user
mailing list