gravatar
kpeter (Peter Kovacs)
kpeter@inf.elte.hu
Add citations to the scaling MCF algorithms (#180, #184) and improve the doc of their group.
0 3 0
default
3 files changed with 12 insertions and 11 deletions:
↑ Collapse diff ↑
Ignore white space 6 line context
... ...
@@ -403,21 +403,19 @@
403 403
problem and its dual solution, see \ref min_cost_flow
404 404
"Minimum Cost Flow Problem".
405 405

	
406 406
LEMON contains several algorithms for this problem.
407 407
 - \ref NetworkSimplex Primal Network Simplex algorithm with various
408 408
   pivot strategies \ref dantzig63linearprog, \ref kellyoneill91netsimplex.
409
 - \ref CostScaling Push-Relabel and Augment-Relabel algorithms based on
410
   cost scaling \ref goldberg90approximation, \ref goldberg97efficient,
409
 - \ref CostScaling Cost Scaling algorithm based on push/augment and
410
   relabel operations \ref goldberg90approximation, \ref goldberg97efficient,
411 411
   \ref bunnagel98efficient.
412
 - \ref CapacityScaling Successive Shortest %Path algorithm with optional
413
   capacity scaling \ref edmondskarp72theoretical.
414
 - \ref CancelAndTighten The Cancel and Tighten algorithm
415
   \ref goldberg89cyclecanceling.
416
 - \ref CycleCanceling Cycle-Canceling algorithms
417
   \ref klein67primal, \ref goldberg89cyclecanceling.
412
 - \ref CapacityScaling Capacity Scaling algorithm based on the successive
413
   shortest path method \ref edmondskarp72theoretical.
414
 - \ref CycleCanceling Cycle-Canceling algorithms, two of which are
415
   strongly polynomial \ref klein67primal, \ref goldberg89cyclecanceling.
418 416

	
419 417
In general NetworkSimplex is the most efficient implementation,
420 418
but in special cases other algorithms could be faster.
421 419
For example, if the total supply and/or capacities are rather small,
422 420
CapacityScaling is usually the fastest algorithm (without effective scaling).
423 421
*/
Ignore white space 6 line context
... ...
@@ -63,13 +63,14 @@
63 63

	
64 64
  /// \brief Implementation of the Capacity Scaling algorithm for
65 65
  /// finding a \ref min_cost_flow "minimum cost flow".
66 66
  ///
67 67
  /// \ref CapacityScaling implements the capacity scaling version
68 68
  /// of the successive shortest path algorithm for finding a
69
  /// \ref min_cost_flow "minimum cost flow". It is an efficient dual
69
  /// \ref min_cost_flow "minimum cost flow" \ref amo93networkflows,
70
  /// \ref edmondskarp72theoretical. It is an efficient dual
70 71
  /// solution method.
71 72
  ///
72 73
  /// Most of the parameters of the problem (except for the digraph)
73 74
  /// can be given using separate functions, and the algorithm can be
74 75
  /// executed using the \ref run() function. If some parameters are not
75 76
  /// specified, then default values will be used.
Ignore white space 12 line context
... ...
@@ -87,14 +87,16 @@
87 87
  /// @{
88 88

	
89 89
  /// \brief Implementation of the Cost Scaling algorithm for
90 90
  /// finding a \ref min_cost_flow "minimum cost flow".
91 91
  ///
92 92
  /// \ref CostScaling implements a cost scaling algorithm that performs
93
  /// push/augment and relabel operations for finding a minimum cost
94
  /// flow. It is an efficient primal-dual solution method, which
93
  /// push/augment and relabel operations for finding a \ref min_cost_flow
94
  /// "minimum cost flow" \ref amo93networkflows, \ref goldberg90approximation,
95
  /// \ref goldberg97efficient, \ref bunnagel98efficient. 
96
  /// It is a highly efficient primal-dual solution method, which
95 97
  /// can be viewed as the generalization of the \ref Preflow
96 98
  /// "preflow push-relabel" algorithm for the maximum flow problem.
97 99
  ///
98 100
  /// Most of the parameters of the problem (except for the digraph)
99 101
  /// can be given using separate functions, and the algorithm can be
100 102
  /// executed using the \ref run() function. If some parameters are not
0 comments (0 inline)